Guns legal in national parks

Feb 21 2010 3 Comments

By Josh Garvey

Lansing, Mich. – A new federal law allows firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges, including concealed guns and makes state law applicable within the park or refuge.

In Michigan, that means a person with a concealed weapons permit can have a hidden gun; an openly displayed firearm is also legal. The change doesn’t apply to national forests, which already follow state laws.

Tim Colyer, the chief ranger of Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, said that the new law will “change the way we’ve historically done things in the National Park Service.”

As a general rule, firearms have always been prohibited, he said. “Now, Pictured Rocks has always been a little unique in that we’re one of 18 parks in the service that has always allowed hunting, So I don’t think it will affect us as much as it would someone like Yellowstone.”

Michigan has five national parks, Isle Royale and Keweenaw National Parks, Pictured Rocks and Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore and the still unfinished North Country Scenic Trail. There are also eight national wildlife refuges and management areas: Detroit River, Harbor Island, Huron, Kirtlands Warbler, Michigan Wetland, Michigan Islands, Seney and Shiawassee.

Buildings within parks and refugees aren’t covered because they are federal facilities, a point stressed by both Colyer and Larry Johnson, the chief ranger of Sleeping Bear Dunes.

“We’ll be posting information on the buildings and federal facilities where firearms will not be allowed,” Johnson said. “The state laws that will be in effect don’t trump the federal law that prohibits firearms in federal facilities,” he said, including visitor centers and other buildings.

Lynn McClure, the Midwest regional director of the National Parks Conservation Association in Chicago, said that Sleeping Bear has only two rangers on duty at a time.

“The new law puts an even greater burden on the Parks Service’s understaffed law enforcement division,” she said.  “How can two guys keep the peace with the normal things you encounter with visitors during the summer, and now also have to be on the look out for this new sort of potential danger?

“I would hazard to say it can’t be done, or at least can’t be done easily,” McClure said.

Erin McDonough, the executive director of Michigan United Conservation Clubs, said there’s no reason for the national parks to have separate laws from the state.

“The people who are going to do anything illegal with guns are going to do it regardless of the laws,” she said. “All you’re doing is punishing the legal gun owners for no reason.”

One concern arising from the new firearm rules is enforcement of anti-poaching laws because, Johnson said, it will be more difficult to identify illegal hunters.

“It will make it a little harder for us to prove a poaching case,” he said. “Obviously, under current law, carrying a firearm is one element of the crime.

“There’s still no change in the prohibition against using the weapon. We’ll take it in stride and we don’t anticipate too many problems,” he said.

Chris Case, the acting superintendent at Pictured Rocks, said he’s not concerned about that risk.

“There isn’t a high number of game animals here,” he said.

Colyer said that the Pictured Rock staff is preparing for any culture shock because of the change.

“We have been and still are in the process of making sure everybody understands exactly what the new law means and how it applies to the park and park employees and a little bit of what to expect from visitors,” he said.

“We’re trying to make sure our employees know that people are allowed to carry firearms- ‘here’s what the law says, here’s what that means to us, here’s how we should deal with it if you are approached or if you receive a report.”

© 2012, Capital News Service, Michigan State University School of Journalism. Not to be reproduced without CNS permission.

3 Comments »

  • Dave said:

    It’s sad that our culture has become one where people feel impotent unless they have a weapon to compensate for any personal inadequacies. For the specific purpose of hunting, firearms are indeed necessary but for anything else they are likely to be kindling for conflagrations of anger that often erupt when one or more parties feel “super-empowered” by virtue of being armed.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • Angela said:

    This is an unfortunate development. When will our country wake up and realize that our attitude toward easy access to guns is a mistake? That’s why we have a higher per capita death rate by gun than most countries. Another victory for the NRA.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Brian said:

    This is great! There is no reason I should not be able to carry my gun in a National Park within Michigan when it is legal for me to carry it anywhere else in Michigan (besides fed. buildings, arenas, etc.). There are cougars, bears, coyotes, etc. in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, and I feel safe with my gun.

    “The new law puts an even greater burden on the Parks Service’s understaffed law enforcement division,” says Lynn McClure. With understaffed park services and police departments, it is becoming more necessary for individuals to protect themselves. By definition, criminals do not follow laws. Having laws in place that limit an individual’s ability to carry a gun only limit that ability for law abiding citizens.

    “When will our country wake up and realize that our attitude toward easy access to guns is a mistake?,” asked Angela. I ask, “Have you ever bought a gun and what attitude are you speaking of?” They are not easy to access, nor is there an attitude of easy access. Most gun owners along with the NRA support background checks and safe storage of guns to prevent unauthorized access. Access to guns is not “…why we have a higher per capita death rate by gun than most countries,” as opposed to what Angela commented. Its corrupted society, broken families, and lack of respect and decency toward others that is the cause. This is even more reason for me to have a gun.

    “For the specific purpose of hunting, firearms are indeed necessary…,” is the only part of Dave’s comment I agree with. They are also necessary for protection from predatory animals and “defense of himself and the state” as stated by the Michigan Constitution. Your “personal inadequacies” will become very apparent when a bear is attacking you or your family. You will wish you were “super-empowered” by a firearm.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.